The description of Judas death is not the only problem skeptics have with Acts 1:18.
Since Matthew 27:5-6 says the chief priests used the betrayal money that Judas threw on the
temple floor to purchase the potters field, critics contend that a contradiction exists
because Acts 1:18 indicates that Judas purchased the field with the blood money. Obviously,
Judas could not have purchased the field because he gave the 30 pieces of silver back to the
priests before hanging himself. Thus, to say that Judas bought the potters field is
I suppose if common sense and unbiased reasoning were omitted from this discussion, then one
might conclude that these differences represent a legitimate contradiction. If one believes it is
wrong to say a father bought a car for his son, when in actuality the son purchased the car with
$5,000 his father gave him, then I suppose that Acts 1:18 and Matthew 27:5-6 are contradictory. If
one believes that it is wrong to say an employer purchased a meal for his staff, when it really
was one of the employees who handed the money to the waiter, then the events recorded in Acts 1:18
could be considered fictitious. But what reasonable person would reach such conclusions as these?
Acts 1:18 simply informs us that Judas furnished the means of purchasing the field. One
is not forced to conclude that Judas personally bought the potters field. As in
modern-day writings and speeches, it is very common for the Scriptures to represent a man as doing
a thing when, in fact, he merely supplies the means for doing it. For example, Joseph spoke of his
brothers as selling him into Egypt (Genesis 45:4-5; cf. Acts 7:9), when actually they sold
him to the Ishmaelites (who then sold him into Egypt). John mentions that the
Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John (though Jesus Himself
did not baptize, but His disciples) (John 4:1-3). And when the Bible says, Pilate took
Jesus and scourged Him (John 19:1), most people understand that he simply ordered
Jesus to be scourged, not that he actually did the scourging himself. The same principle is
recognized in law in the well-known Latin maxim, Qui facit per alium, facit per
se (he who acts through another is deemed in law to do it himself).
Whether one says that Judas purchased a field with the wages of iniquity (Acts
1:18), or that the chief priests bought with them the potters field (Matthew
27:7), he has stated the same truth, only in different ways.
Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558