“And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob; and Elhanan the son of
Jaareoregim the Beth-lehemite slew Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a
weaver’s beam” (2 Samuel 21:19).
“And there was again war with the Philistines; and Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the
brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam” (1
The record of David and Goliath (1 Samuel 17) clearly speaks of the defeat of the giant of Gath
by the shepherd boy. This story is used to emphasize faith and faithfulness to the young from
their earliest ages. However, some have alleged a discrepancy between the account in 1 Samuel and
two other passages (2 Samuel 21:19 and 1 Chronicles 20:5). According to 2 Samuel 21:19, it appears
that Elhanan killed Goliah; yet 1 Chronicles 20:5 states that Elhanan killed Lahmi the brother
of Goliath. The question, then, is who did Elhanan kill?
First, we must recognize who Elhanan was not. According to 1 Chronicles 20:5, Elhanan
was the son of Jair. This was not the same man as Elhanan the Bethlehemite, son of Dodo (2 Samuel
23:24; Keil and Delitzsch, 1996, 2:681). Furthermore, it appears that Jair and Jaareoregim
actually are the same person (Barnes, 1998, 2:120). Barnes, as well as the editors of The
Pulpit Commentary, noted that the difficulty may have begun when oregim, the Hebrew
word translated “weaver” in this passage, ended up being placed on the wrong line by a
copyist—something that has been known to happen in several instances (see Spence and Exell,
1978, 4:514). Therefore, Jair, combined with oregim, became Jaare-oregim in order to
make it fit with proper Hebrew grammar (Spence and Exell, 4:514).
Second, the phrase “Lahmi the brother of” is absent in 2 Samuel 21:19. The King James
Version inserts the phrase “the brother of” between “Bethlehemite” and “
Goliath.” Furthermore, in the Hebrew, eth Lachmi (a combination of “Lahmi”
and the term “brother”) appears to have been changed into beith hallachmi (Beth-
lehemite). With this simple correction, the two texts would be in clear agreement (Clarke, n.d.,
p. 369). In other words, “the brother of” and the name “Lahmi” likely were
combined by a copyist to form what is translated in English as “Beth-lehemite” in 2
Samuel 21:19. This, however, caused the difficulty when the passage was paralleled with 1
In his Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, Gleason Archer used the same scenario
mentioned above to explain this difficulty, and then summed up the situation by noting: “In
other words, the 2 Samuel 21 passage is a perfectly traceable corruption of the original wording,
which fortunately has been correctly preserved in 1 Chronicles 20:5” (1982, p. 179). A fair,
in-depth examination of the alleged difficulty shows that there actually is no contradiction at
all, but simply a copyist’s mistake.
Archer, Gleason L. (1982), Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties (Grand Rapids, MI:
Barnes, Albert (1998 reprint), Barnes’ Notes: Exodus to Esther (Grand Rapids, MI:
Clarke, Adam (no date), Commentary and Critical Notes on the Old Testament: Joshua to Esther
(New York, NY: Abingdon).
Keil, C.F., and F. Delitzsch (1996), Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth,
1 and 2 Samuel (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
Spence, H.D.M., and Joseph S. Exell, Eds. (1978), The Pulpit Commentary: Ruth, I & II
Samuel (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558