In the book of 1 Kings we read that Baasha became the third ruler of the Northern kingdom
(Israel) in the third year of Asa king of Judah…and reigned twenty-four years (15:33).
Then, when Baasha died, his son Elah became king over Israel in the twenty-sixth year of
Asa king of Judah (16:8, emp. added). However, 2 Chronicles 16:1 reads: In the
thirty-sixth year of the reign of Asa, Baasha king of Israel came up against Judah and built
Ramah, that he might let none go out or come in to Asa king of Judah (emp. added). The
obvious question that anyone has who reads these two passages is: How could Baasha be ruling over
Israel in the thirty-sixth year of Asas reign, when 1 Kings 16 clearly indicates that Baasha
had died when Asa (the third king of the southern kingdom) was only in the twenty-sixth year of
his reign? Is it possible to reconcile 1 Kings 16:8 with 2 Chronicles 15:19-16:1? Or, is this a
legitimate contradiction that should lead all of us to conclude that the Bible is a worthless
manmade book of myths?
There are two possible solutions to this problem. To begin with, it may be that the numbers
recorded in 2 Chronicles 15:19 and 16:1 simply are the result of a copyists error. Although
skeptics may scoff at attempts to reconcile contradictions by claiming a copyist must
have made an error sometime in the distant past, the fact is, copyists were not infallible;
inspired men were the only infallible writers. Whenever duplicates of the Old Testament Scriptures
were needed, copies had to be made by handa painstaking, time-consuming task requiring
extreme concentration. History records that copyists (such as the Masoretes) had as their goal to
produce accurate copies of Scripture and that they went to great lengths to ensure fidelity in
their copies. They were, nevertheless, still human. And humans are prone to make mistakes,
regardless of the care they take or the strictness of the rules under which they operate. The
copyists task was made all the more difficult by the sheer complexity of the Hebrew language
and by the various ways in which potential errors could be introduced.
In their commentary on 2 Chronicles, Keil and Delitzsch proposed that the number 36 in 2
Chronicles 16:1 and the number 35 in 15:19 are a scribal error for 16 and 15, respectively. The
ancient Hebrew letters yod and lamed, representing the numbers 30 and 10, could have
been confused and interchanged quite easily (though inadvertently) by a copyist. Merely a smudge
from excessive wear on a scroll-column or a punctured or slightly torn manuscript could have
resulted in making the yod look like a lamed. Furthermore, it also is possible that
this error occurred first in 2 Chronicles 15:19. Then to make it consistent in 16:1, a copyist may
have concluded that 16 must be an error for 36 and changed it accordingly (Archer, 1982, p. 226).
Hence the numbers 35 and 36 could have arisen out of the original 15 and 16. With such an
adjustment, the statements in 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles are harmonized easily.
A second possibility as to why the numbers in 1 Kings 16:8 and 2 Chronicles 15:19-16:1 seem
contradictory is because the numbers may refer to the thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth years after
the division of the United Kingdom (which would have been Asas fifteenth and sixteenth
years), rather than the thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth years of Asas reign (Thiele, 1951, p.
59). The Hebrew word for reign (malkuwth) also can mean kingdom. In
fact, 51 out of the 91 times this word appears in the King James Version of the Old Testament it
is translated kingdom (cf. 2 Chronicles 1:1; 11:17; 20:30; Nehemiah 9:35; etc.). In
their commentary on 2 Chronicles, Jamieson, Faussett, and Brown favored this explanation saying,
The best Biblical critics are agreed in considering this date to be calculated from the
separation of the kingdoms, and coincident with the 16th year of Asas reign (1997).
[The number 16 is obtained by subtracting the reigns of Rehoboam (17 years) and Abijah (3 years)
from the 36 years mentioned in 2 Chronicles 16:1.] But, as Gleason Archer recognized,
It is without parallel to refer to the kingdom of a nation as a whole and identify
it thus with one particular king who comes later on in the ruling dynasty. And the fact that in
its account of the later history of Judah no such usage can be instanced in Chronicles raises a
formidable difficulty to this solution (p. 225).
First Kings 16:8 reveals that Baasha could not have ruled over Israel in the thirty-sixth year
of Asas reign in Judah. Either the numbers 35 and 36 in 2 Chronicles 15:19-16:1 are a
copyists error, or they represent the total number of years since the United Kingdom
divided. Whichever is the case, both provide possible solutions to the alleged problem that exists
between the two passages. In no way should the differences that exist between 1 Kings 16:8 and 2
Chronicles 15:19-16:1 cause one to reject the Bible as Gods inspired Word.
Archer, Gleason L. (1982), An Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties (Grand Rapids, MI:
Jamieson, Robert, et al. (1997), Jamieson, Faussett, Brown Bible Commentary (Electronic
Keil, C.F. and F. Delitzsch (1996), Keil and Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
(Electronic Database: Biblesoft), new updated edition.
Thiele, Edwin R. (1951), The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings (Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press).
Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558