[NOTE: During the February 12, 2009 Darwin Day debate with Kyle Butt, Dan Barker listed 14 alleged Bible discrepancies as evidence against God’s existence. He insisted (11 minutes and 24 seconds into his opening speech) that the Bible gives contradictory descriptions of God’s power, because of a statement about the Israelite’s failure to conquer their neighbors who possessed iron chariots. His allegation is refuted in the following article written by Kyle in 2004.]
It has been suggested that the Bible is filled with contradictions. One of the supposed
contradictions is between Joshua 17:18 and Judges 1:19. Let us look closely at these verses and
their contexts to see if any real contradiction exists.
Joshua 17:18: “But the mountain country shall be yours. Although it is wooded,
you shall cut it down, and its farthest extent shall be yours; for you shall drive out the
Canaanites, though they have iron chariots and are strong.”
Judges 1:19: “So the Lord was with Judah. And they drove out the mountaineers, but they
could not drive out the inhabitants of the lowland, because they had chariots of iron.”
After reading the two verses, it may look like they contradict one another. Did the children of
Israel defeat the Canaanites with their chariots of iron as Joshua apparently had said they would,
or were the chariots just too powerful for the people of Judah to overcome?
These two passages have several plausible ways of reconciliation. And, please remember that the
exact way to reconcile any contradiction need not be pinpointed, as long as a possible
way can be provided. The rest of this brief answer will deal with only two of the many
possible ways to reconcile the passages.
The first way to reconcile the passages is to show that Joshua was informing his listeners that
they had the power to drive out the Canaanites only if they would follow God faithfully and
be confident in His promises. Judges chapter 2:1-3 says:
Then the Angel of the Lord came up from Gilgal to Bochim, and said: “I led you
up from Egypt and brought you to the land of which I swore to your fathers; and I said, ‘I
will never break My covenant with you. And you shall make no covenant with the inhabitants of this
land; you shall tear down their altars.’ But you have not obeyed My voice. Why have you done
this? Therefore I also said, ‘I will not drive them out before you; but they shall be thorns
in your side, and their gods shall be a snare to you.’ ”
God’s promise through Joshua was not an unconditional guarantee that the children of
Israel would possess all of the land they had been promised. It was conditional, based upon the
faithfulness of the Israelites and their obedience to God’s commandments. After all, God
never would force the Israelites to clear the wooded areas against their will. Neither would He
force them to conquer the iron chariots. The two verses under discussion easily could be dealing
with land that God chose not to clear of its previous inhabitants because of the disobedience of
the people of Judah.
A second possible solution could be that the children of Israel did conquer the mountain
country and succeeded in driving out its inhabitants for a brief time, but they were unable to
maintain control of the cities. Thus, by the time referred to in Judges 1, the cities already
could have been retaken by the chariots of iron.
As a final word, notice that Joshua said that “the mountain country” and “its
farthest extents” were the promised possession of the Israelites. In Judges 1:19, the
children of Israel did, indeed, drive out “the inhabitants of the mountains.” Unless we
force the phrase “its farthest extents” in Joshua 17:18 to read “lowland” as
in Judges 1:19, then there is absolutely no hint of a contradiction, and this entire explanation
Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558