Versión en Español


Alleged Discrepancies

Article Reprints

Audio Resources

Bible Bullets

Darwin Day Debate

Decisive Designs


“In the News”

Reason & Revelation

Research Articles

Scripturally Speaking

Sensible Science


Discovery for Kids

Examine the Evidence

Home Study Courses



A.P. Information

About AP

Contact AP

Copyright Statement

Help AP

Privacy Statement

Speaking Schedules

A.P. Scientists and
Auxiliary Writers

Usage Guidelines

Apologetics Press :: In the News

Wrong About the Grand Canyon
by Kyle Butt, M.A.
Printer version | Email this article

For many years, awe-stricken tourists to the Grand Canyon have been fed a steady stream of uniformitarian propaganda designed to teach that the amazing chasm took six million years to form. Uniformitarian geologists, however, recently concluded that the “traditional” age of six million years has been incorrect. In fact, they suggest that parts of the Grand Canyon began to open “at least 17 million years ago” (Neergaard, 2008).

As you can imagine, a discrepancy of almost 300% for the canyon’s age has gained international media attention. And it brings to light several glaring, irreparable problems inherent in the uniformitarian philosophy. First, it should be noted that if the new research is right, uniformitarian texts that have used the six-million-year figure have been glaringly incorrect for the past several decades. Thus, all those visitors who were taught the Canyon was six million years old were misinformed. If such “solid” dates can be adjusted upward so easily, should we not eye their accuracy as extremely suspect? If the Canyon’s age can be adjusted by 11 million years with one or two studies, could the age be adjusted by 5.9 million years in the other direction? And who is to say that in five or 10 years, new “research” will not tell us that the Canyon is 30 million years old, or 100 million?

In truth, the Canyon never was six million years old, and it certainly is not 17 million years old. Such outlandish dates are based on faulty evolutionary dating methods that have been proven to be inaccurate due to their reliance on unprovable assumptions. Neergaard reported that the research team responsible for the current age-adjustment used “uranium-lead isotope testing” to arrive at the new dates (2008). But uranium-lead isotope testing is known to render ridiculously exaggerated dates (see DeYoung, 2005; Snelling, n.d.).

Geological structures in the Grand Canyon do not even point to a uniformitarian origin for the huge chasm. In fact, models that present a catastrophic origin fit the available evidence much more readily. Several books have been published verifying that such is the case, including Grand Canyon: A Different View (Vail, 2003) and Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe (Austin, 1994).

Evolutionary uniformitarianists often point to “proven” ages of millions of years to “disprove” the biblical account of Creation. The recent research on the Grand Canyon shows us that such ages never were “proven” in the first place. Furthermore, the actual geological evidence shows that the entire philosophical approach of uniformitarianism is untenable. It is time we turned our attention back to the Book that will never change—the Word of God.


Austin, Steven (1994), Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe (Santee, CA: ICR).

DeYoung, Don (2005), Thousands...Not Billions (Green Forest, AR: Master Books).

Neergaard, Lauran (2008), “It Took Eons to Make Grand Canyon Grand,” [On-line], URL:;_ylt=AhnI3 _H1G1YAzFMF0TkJVuvQOrgF.

Snelling, Andrew (no date), “The Fallacies of Radioactive Dating of Rocks: Basalt Lava Flows in Grand Canyon,” [On-line], URL:

Vail, Tom (2003), Grand Canyon: A Different View (Green Forest, AR: Master Books).

Copyright © 2008 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the "In the News" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558

Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.094 Seconds