Versión en Español

Contents

Alleged Discrepancies

Article Reprints

Audio Resources

Bible Bullets

Darwin Day Debate

Decisive Designs

E-Books

“In the News”

Reason & Revelation

Research Articles

Scripturally Speaking

Sensible Science

Resources

Discovery for Kids

Examine the Evidence

Home Study Courses

Feedback

EBGlobal

A.P. Information

About AP

Contact AP

Copyright Statement

Help AP

Privacy Statement

Speaking Schedules

A.P. Scientists and
Auxiliary Writers


Usage Guidelines








Apologetics Press :: Reason & Revelation
December 2004 - 3[12]:48-R

In the News: Was Darwin Wrong? YES!
by Bert Thompson, Ph.D. and Brad Harrub, Ph.D.

Printer version | Email this article

Pictorial propaganda aside, if this was the best they had, then the Darwinian theory of evolution is in worse shape than most of us imagined. The splash was big, but the story between the lines is even bigger. The November 2004, cover story for National Geographic was titled: “Was Darwin Wrong?” The accompanying article immediately and forthrightly answered that question in 250-point bold type: “No.” The subtitle (in 72-point bold type) declared, “The evidence for Evolution is overwhelming.”

And what, exactly, was this “overwhelming evidence?” The author David Quammen, used warmed over, antiquated arguments such as:

  • horse evolution (Eohippus to Equus)
  • embryologic recapitulation (bringing to mind Ernst Haeckel’s falsified embryos)
  • natural selection
  • Archaeopteryx as a reptile-to-bird transitional form
  • mutating viruses and antibiotic-resistant bacteria
  • vestigial organs

Interestingly, Mr. Quammen is not a biologist (nor a scientist of any sort). His specialty is—literature (which might explain his poor choice of “overwhelming evidence”). National Geographic published and lauded an article—consuming over thirty pages of the magazine!—that is so filled with time-worn canards that long ago were discarded as “proofs” of evolution, even stalwart evolutionists must be shaking their heads in disbelief and hiding under laboratory benches out of embarrassment.

This issue of National Geographic was an obvious attempt to perpetuate the myth that evolution is a “fact.” However, using bigger font type and gorgeous pictures will not make the woefully weak case for organic evolution somehow “stronger.”

We have written an extensive response to Quammen and National Geographic that we invite you to read. Quammen may have flowery words and pretty pictures, but we can prove that his scientific assessment of evolutionary theory leaves much to be desired. We encourage you to read our response, and then decide for yourself.

The rebuttal can be found at: http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2644. While you’re at it, why not bring this information to the attention of friends and coworkers as well?



Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

This document may be copied, on the condition that it will not be republished in print unless otherwise stated below, and will not be used for any commercial purpose, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (4) textual alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden; (5) Some illustrations (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, etc.) are not the intellectual property of Apologetics Press and as such cannot be reproduced from our site without consent from the person or organization that maintains those intellectual rights; (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original written content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken. Further, documents may not be copied without source statements (title, author, journal title), and the address of the publisher and owner of rights, as listed below.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
U.S.A.
Phone (334) 272-8558
http://www.apologeticspress.org



Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.085 Seconds